MBS 93-06
Modeling Negative Campaigning
Stergios Skaperdas and Bernard Grofman
Negative campaigning is an important aspect of campaign competition
that has been the focus of a great deal of journalistic attention but little
or no formal modeling. Within the context of plurality elections for a
single office we model the incentives that affect the use of negative campaigning
in three situations: two-candidate competition, three-candidate competition
with two main candidates and a third "spoiler" candidate, and three-candidate
competition each of whom has some realistic potential to be elected. Under
simplifying but still quite general assumptions we show a number of results,
including the following key conclusions. Ceteris paribus, (1) for two-candidate
competition, in many circumstances there will be a mix of positive and
negative campaigning, but the front runner will engage in more positive
and less negative campaigning than his opponent, and negative campaigning
will increase the greater the opponent's support; (2) for two-candidate
competition where a third candidate is added who is not a serious threat,
the addition of such a candidate can be expected to intensify the negative
campaigning of the two front runners; (3) in any three-candidate contest,
including that where the third-place candidate is also potentially a winner,
no candidate engages in negative campaigning against the weaker of his
two opponents.